27 September 2008
There are two sources of valuable information. These are crash test results and car accident statistics.
Crash tests are a scientific way of rating individual cars for safety. Australian New Car Assessment Programme (ANCAP) runs three different tests. The most realistic of these is the offset test. This determines the chance of the occupants' survival when the car crashes into a solid object at 64km/h, at a slight angle.
ANCAP believes occupants should survive a collision at 64km/h. Cars tested in this programme receive a star rating indicating chances of injury. One star is a pass, but an occupant would probably be injured. Five stars means you would probably walk away from the car accident.
The other way to rate cars for safety is by statistical analysis of real world crashes. For information on crashes on New Zealand roads, Land Transport NZ has linked up with Melbourne's Monash University Accident Research Centre.
There, researchers have conducted a huge study of two-way car crashes in New Zealand and Australia. Using statistics, Monash researchers have rated cars according to their chances of killing or injuring their occupants in a two-vehicle crash.
Both methods show significant differences between individual models and years. In general, most late 1980s cars are:
Pre-2000 vehicles which are in the Light (under 1300cc) and Small (1500cc) classes rate poorly.
Other significant findings include:
SUVs or 4WDs appear safe. Some are amongst the safest cars in two-vehicle collisions. The problem is their high-riding nature and tank-like construction. You're actually driving a light truck. If you lose control in the wet, you're less likely to regain it.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this page. You cannot post comments until you have logged in. Please log in or register if you don't have an account.